History
"Gyumri is also exceptional because it, consciously or subconsciously, imitates a town living in a myth - Ani, the famous capital of medieval Armenia. Gyumri tried to look like Ani, but now it looks like its ruins." - From the introduction to the accompanying book for
the first International Arts Biennial, Gyumri, 1998.
The inhabitants of 19th-century Gyumri, then known as Alexandropol, saw their city as the historical successor to Ani. The building in Gyumri that most clearly reveals that aspiration is the church known as Surp Amenaprkich.
Begun in the year 1858, and finished in 1873, this church's design was a deliberate recreation of the cathedral of Ani. Its architect was the master mason Tadevos Andikyan. Contemporary accounts tell that Andikyan would often take a coach in the evening and go to Ani where, at dawn the following morning, he would measure and record on paper some part of the cathedral. He would then return to Alexandropol and recreate that part with his fellow masons, adding his own innovations to the designs. Ani at that time was within Turkish territory, so it is unlikely a detailed study of the cathedral would have been possible - and even just visiting the ruins would have been risky. It is possible that the recently published engravings of Ani by Brosset and Texier were also used for inspiration.
Surp Amenaprkich was originally located within a walled enclosure that had an entrance on its western side. The large square that now extends from the north side of the church all the way to Surp Astvatsatsin dates from Soviet period - during the 19th century this area was filled with buildings, mostly small shops and workshops.
During the 1930s Surp Amenaprkich (along with all the city's churches except Surp Astvatsatsin) was confiscated by the State and closed for worship, and there was an attempt to pull down its dome using chains. Later, in 1937, the bell tower belfry was blown up using explosives. In 1964 Gyumri's chief architect, Rafik Eghoyan, had the bell tower reconstructed in its original form. In the 1970s and 1980s the church was used as a concert hall for philharmonic orchestras. At the end of 1988 renovation work was being carried out on Surp Amenaprkich.
At 11.41 local time, on the morning of December 7th 1988, a magnitude 6.9 earthquake shook north-western Armenia. It was followed four minutes later by a magnitude 5.8 aftershock. The earthquakes, with their epicentres close to the town of Spitak, affected an area 80 kilometres in diameter and, according to official figures, killed 25,000 people, injured 140,000, and caused 500,000 to loose their homes. The whole of Gyumri was shaken and an estimated 80 per cent of its buildings collapsed or were seriously damaged. Only the eastern third of Surp Amenaprkich remained upright, along with a small part of the bell tower's façade.
In 1997 a project was initiated with the goal of rebuilding the ruined church to its former appearance. R. Yeghoyan was chosen as the project architect, and H. Meyroyan as the head of construction. The rebuilding work began on the 8th May 1998 ¹.
However, the church is not a slavish copy of the Ani cathedral, and there are many obvious differences. The Gyumri church is larger in size, and has more, and bigger, windows. These windows do not have hooded mouldings like the cathedral, but have rounded frames. The many porthole windows are certainly inspired by those on the Ani cathedral, but they are used in different locations. The dome of the Ani cathedral would not have had an umbrella-shaped roof - the roof at nearby Marmashen monastery may have inspired its use in Gyumri.
The exterior of Surp Amenaprkich is richly ornamented with stone carvings, including a large quantity of figurative sculpture of doubtful taste to modern eyes ². Some of the ornamentation, such as the carvings inside the top of the niches on the west facade, is directly inspired by details found on the Ani cathedral. However, most of it is entirely alien to the architecture of Ani, and is a result of an amalgam of late medieval motifs and contemporary 19th-century Armenian religious tastes ³.
The approach taken for the exterior seems to be to retain and repair the surviving parts and recreate the missing parts as they originally appeared. The workmanship is of a high quality and from a distance it is difficult to tell apart the original and newly built sections of the façade.
For the interior, however, the inner faces of the walls are being reconstructed using reinforced concrete. The original facing stone is being retained in the apse, but new construction in stone is limited to the piers.
Cracks caused by the earthquake have meant that the surviving western half of the church has lost much of its structural integrity. To strengthen it, the facing stonework inside the chapels that flank the apse have been encased behind a grid of steel rods that are then tied to rods fixed into the core of the wall. This web of rods will be hidden behind a layer of concrete applied on top of the original stone surface.
|
|
|